Kevin O’Leary says Elon Musk’s DOGE isn’t ‘whacking enough’ and the cuts aren’t happening ‘fast enough’ — despite intense criticism of its recent actions. Do you agree?

There’s a lot of fat to trim

While many Americans and political leaders alike are worried about the impact of DOGE's actions, O'Leary thinks there's more work to be done, and that it should be done more quickly.

During a recent appearance on CNN, O'Leary compared what's happening with the federal government to a private equity takeover.

He explained that when distressed companies are taken over, the cuts often exceed initial projections, and that that's a good thing, because it tends to make the organization work more efficiently.

"All of these agencies are like big fat chickens dripping over barbecues of fat," O'Leary. "If they can't show you that they're adding value, you whack."

The problem, though, is that a lot of the federal employees being let go, and a lot of the programs being cut, serve the purpose of helping Americans in one way or another. It’s true that there may be fat to trim. But O’Leary’s suggestion to “keep slashing” has the potential to hurt the public.

Invest in real estate without the headache of being a landlord

Imagine owning a portfolio of thousands of well-managed single family rentals or a collection of cutting-edge industrial warehouses. You can now gain access to a $1B portfolio of income-producing real estate assets designed to deliver long-term growth from the comforts of your couch.

The best part? You don’t have to be a millionaire and can start investing in minutes.

Learn More

How federal cuts could hurt Americans’ finances

The fact that the IRS is slashing jobs during tax season means filers may have a harder time contacting the agency for support. Even without cuts, the IRS is notorious for long wait times.

There could also be fewer employees available to conduct audits. And while it can be argued that that's a good thing, it's most likely to benefit wealthy taxpayers who tend to skirt the rules and underreport income.

Taking away the CFPB's power could also hurt consumers' finances. One thing the CFPB did was launch an initiative to save consumers billions of dollars per year by reducing junk fees charged by banks and credit card issuers. If the CFPB is derailed, consumers won't have an agency to advocate on their behalf.

Cuts to USDA programs could also limit domestic agricultural output. That could result in shortages of commonly consumed goods. Cutting USDA funding could also leave farmers on the hook for higher costs, which they may pass on to consumers, driving food prices upward.

Cuts at the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), meanwhile, could exacerbate the affordable housing crisis that's already plaguing the nation. HUD also supports homeownership among lower and moderate-income families through the Federal Housing Administration, which insures mortgages. If funding and staff are cut, FHA loans could be harder to come by.

Finally, while DOGE isn't cutting Social Security benefits, numerous Social Security offices are shutting their doors in the wake of DOGE cuts. This could, in turn, make it harder for seniors to get their Social Security questions addressed and even file for benefits, which those who aren't tech-savvy may opt to do in person.

O’Leary is right in that wasteful spending needs to be reduced at the federal level. But any fiscal gain needs to be weighed against the potential for negative impact on Americans’ lives.